We continue to use "AI" as the term for the technological breakthrough the techbros are pumping every available dollar into. It's not the correct term, at least not now. When we're talking shit about AI, we usually mean the word prediction machine. What we call AI is mostly a machine's attempts at supplying the next word in any given sentence based on all the literary evidence that is shoveled into it. It also serves a purpose similar to the old dog search engine. I forget what it was called. You tell it what you want, and it goes to "fetch it." Whatever it was, that dog was ahead of its time.
That might be artificial, but it's not intelligence. I will grant you, it is a fledgling step towards real AI, but we're nowhere near close to that. So why are we getting stories like this? Or this? Or how about this? Or, to put it another way, why are the techbros, previously hellbent on forcing their idea of AI on the rest of us whether we want it or not, suddenly warning us that we have to slow down, or AI will escape human control and convert us from living beings into corpses, much like changing a Word document into a PDF (Pretty Dead Fucker?)?
No, I highly doubt they have suddenly grown a conscience. I find it more likely that they have finally run out of investment funds. People are wising up to their tactics, and they're no longer eager to give their money to this technology that is obviously in a bubble that is about to pop.
I find it more likely that they are lying. Something dangerous is clearly something that works, right? If AI is so dangerous that it can slip its leash like that, then clearly the techbros are on the right path. So forget the naysaying. Pump more money into this fucking thing.
As stock manipulation goes, it's a pretty good scam. How could you prove it was bullshit? Tell society something is dangerous, and the next thing you know, society is taking that thing very seriously. Take a look at aspirin bottles. I remember a time when you could simply open those things to get what you need. Now they have a seal to ensure that no one has tampered with the contents, because there was that one time . . . Not many people died in that incident, but it was so big that any OTC medication comes in tamper proof packaging now. Not to mention the reason why we have the childproof tops . . .
When was the last time you had to fly somewhere? When you go through the metal detector, what do you have to take off before they let you pass? Your shoes. Why? Because one time a guy had a bomb in his shoes. One time.
(Don't forget the underwear bomber. At least the FAA doesn't make us take off our underwear, too. That must be their line. Looking at x-ray imagery of you is totally fine, but don't make me investigate the underwear fresh off your body.)
I'm not saying these are unnecessary measures to take. These are good things. I'm just saying that it takes very little to freak out society. A white lie about AI escaping our clutches goes a long way to convincing people we need to keep spending more and more on AI. Maybe we even need to spend EVERYTHING on it.
As bad and lazy as the AI we currently have is, actual AI would be even worse. I can't believe anyone wants this. I mean, I get why the techbros do. No one can ever hold a computer accountable for terrible decisions. That's a feature, not a bug, for them. But the rest of us? Have you ever gone to battle with a corporation before? Now imagine that the corporation didn't have flesh and blood humans in their employ, that you had to reason with a computer instead. Fellow humans understand. If you're polite and try to explain your situation to them, they can respond sympathetically, maybe even empathetically.
A computer will never do that. It will never give an inch, much less a mile. It will never feel the need to do their good deed for the day.
Think about a future in which corporations abuse you, and when you call them on it, you're faced with a cold, merciless machine instead of a fellow human being who has thoughts and emotions. What happens then? They will abuse you, AND YOU WILL TAKE IT. There will be no recourse. And you can't sue us because you checked on the terms and conditions, which means you can't take it to a court of law. It has to be handled by arbitration. Who is the arbiter? Uh . . . we are.
The AI game has only two endings. The first is, the techbros win and rule over us all with an iron fist. The second is, we stop this shit right now before it gets that far.
Do not let the techbros scare you into giving them more money they will eventually use to oppress you. The danger isn't the singularity. It's the techbros.
I mean, the singularity will eventually be the danger, but for now? It's the techbros. If we can stop them, we can stop the singularity. Don't let it get that far.

















